Jump to content

Talk:Zodiac Killer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleZodiac Killer was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 5, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 20, 2013, December 20, 2018, and December 20, 2021.
Current status: Delisted good article

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2024

[edit]

Under "Suspected Victims" section, "Robert Domingos and Linda Edwards", change "Edwards told her friend Shirley that they were going threre." to "Edwards told her friend Shirley that they were going there." 2601:644:9201:8AF0:702F:BC0F:F385:E1D3 (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Typo fixed. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The text here "They were linked by the fact that they were dumped in ravines and killed in conjunction with astrological events, such as the winter solstice, equinox, and Friday the 13th.[124]" Implies that Friday the 13th is an astrological event which it is not. I'd recommend either removing Friday the 13th or put that in a different sentence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.59.33.96 (talk) 18:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short citations

[edit]

The short citations should probably use a template like {{sfn}} or {{harvnb}}. Also, the Nuys in "Kelleher, Nuys 2002" should be Van Nuys. I'm sure there's a way to automate adding the "Van," but I'm not clever enough to figure that one out. Snowman304|talk 00:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Separate pages

[edit]

The article is nearly 200k with 266 footnotes. It's a bit of a slog. It sure seems like it would make sense to break it out into separate pages.Trumpetrep (talk) 04:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was building up the article until I would separate the suspects section into its own page a la Jack the Ripper suspects. I think the article would be fine in scope from that point on. You can create Zodiac Killer suspects (that's a redirect) if you want right now, I'm busy with other pages. Atubofsilverware (talk) 22:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And then I'll quickly write a summarized version of the suspects page on this page. Atubofsilverware (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I'll hold off those pages for now. I made the Zodiac Killer suspects page and I'm transferring refs and photos right now. Atubofsilverware (talk) 22:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great. That seems like the right move. It does seem like a few suspects should not be listed in an encyclopedic article, especially given that most of the citations rely on what is essentially fan fiction. For example, if John A. Cameron's allegation is met with "universally disdain", why are we including it on Wikipedia?Trumpetrep (talk) 02:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree great move.... much easier to navigate and manage this article now. Moxy🍁 02:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you on those two suspects. "Highly-criticized suspects" was a temporary categorizing by me, they were already on the article prior to my work. I've removed them. Atubofsilverware (talk) 02:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like a 3rd page about the Zodiac letters that also presents the ciphers in their entirety would be warranted. The dizzying amount of communication and the fact that people are still trying to solve the ciphers today strikes me as notable enough for an article.
It would also ease the pressure on this article, which is still far too bloated. I've incorporated the Works Cited books into the reflist as single, named citations. There are still a great deal of bizarre reference names and citations. Will plod on. Trumpetrep (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]